A person’s survival experience comes from his way of survival. Reading your work, I try to understand it as much as possible, but I have to say that the novel sent on March 20th, I read it halfway and let it go. "The greatest sorrow of a woman is that she wears a skirt that doesn't fit." This sentence is unacceptable for people like me. I don't think there are such women. The country is in a period of great change, and real life provides writers with a wealth of writing subjects. Anyone can freely choose the subject matter they are interested in. However, you have to understand that the real big subject often chooses the writer. If the big subject chooses you, you are also a writer with a mission and mandate.
What I regret is that you are not keen on real life subjects, you mostly sit in your study dreaming, deliberately writing novels you think. Starting from "I" is understandable, but starting from "I" to "us", you start from "I" and return to "I". It is true that the value of literature is about people, and they must write about people's own problems, and China's national conditions are in a period of social transformation. During a period of great change, people's problems are mixed with social problems. Moreover, no matter what proposition or writing method is used, the purpose is to bring us closer to the true nature of life. Real life itself has skills, and deliberately seeking novelty, it is difficult to write the truth.
Paying attention to reality, in real life, we can be more authentic, more sensitive, and more forward-looking towards the development of reality, and can write our inner joy, sadness, comfort or fear. The tension of the work often lies in the tension with the society. It can also be said that the writer is prone to some friction with the society. This is nothing but the professional nature of writing. However, there are some misunderstandings in the manuscript you recommended, and it is too conceptual. Once you don't let go of concepts and yourself in your work, you will be prejudiced. It can be said that some historical events have been restored, but they have not been restored to literature.
There are various ways of writing in real life. I don't like writing that is deliberately exaggerated and surly. It may be enjoyable to read such a work, but it should not be read for a long time, nor can it be read for a long time. I advocate stepping on the ground and writing the vivid state of life. This kind of freshness is not about facts. The relationship between reality and fiction is handled well. If there are poetic things in it, life can be revealed from the people and things written. The more real the writing, the more virtual the realm of the work, or called it. Vast.
I often ask, why do I write? Who is writing for? This is a big problem, I can't tell, it seems to be born for writing. In fact, this is terrible. I feel that some friends around me, including me, often write for fame, royalties, and awards. Writing has become a kind of grievance. I have seen some painters who only paint two kinds of paintings, one is a commercial painting, and the other is a painting for an art exhibition. Commodity paintings are very sloppy, repeating endlessly, and those participating in the art exhibition are extra-large paintings, and they all cater to politics and trends.
I have a friend who writes very well, but never promotes or hype, writes without utilitarianism, and writes it on his own blog at most. I feel ashamed when I read her work. I have experienced that when I wrote "Destroyed Capital" and "Qin Opera", I didn't want to publish it. It was completely safe for my heart. After I wrote it, some friends read it and published it before publishing it. Although such works are controversial and bring a lot of trouble to their own lives, they can be read by more people and can be read longer. On the contrary, when I want to write something that satisfies others, I write it badly.
